United States v. Friedman
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, District Judge.
The indictment herein charges the defendant with wilful violations of Section 4(a) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 904(a), and of the regulations promulgated under the authority of the Act,-in that after the effective date (December 16, 1942) of Revised Maximum Price Regulation No. 169, the defendant, while engaged in the wholesale meat business, made sales of wholesale cuts of beef at prices in excess of the maximum prices fixed by said regulation. The defendant’s motion to quash this indictment is now before the court.
The motion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Henderson v. KimmelDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1942
- United States v. SlobodkinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
- United States v. HarkDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
- United States v. C. Thomas Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1943
- Johnson v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bowles v. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- Brown v. Warner Holding Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1943
- United States v. Sosnowitz & Lotstein, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1943
- United States v. Beit Bros.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1943
- United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.