Legal Opinion

United States v. Hark

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 5, 1943No. Cr. 16021PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, District Judge.

To this indictment the defendants have filed a demurrer, motions to quash, and pleas in abatement. In these pleadings they attack the constitutionality of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix § 901 et seq., as being both an improper use of the war power by Congress, and an improper delegation by Congress of its legislative function to an administrative agency. They also insist that the defendants’ rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution have been invaded, and further allege that the Government is without authority to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  3. United States v. Armour & Co. of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
  4. United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1944
  5. Rodgers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API