Legal Opinion

United States v. Harris

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 5, 1943No. 11314 CriminalPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This case was heard on defendants’ motion to quash the information, which charges defendants in forty-five counts with violation of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, Pub.Law 421, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess., 56 Stat. 23, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, §§ 901-946, in that they sold meat at prices in excess of those established by price regulations adopted in pursuance of said Act.

The motion to quash raises three questions, i. e.: (1) Is this Act and the regulations adopted pursuant thereto constitutional; (2) is the information sufficiently definite and certain to show any…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. MacIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Henderson v. KimmelDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1942
  3. United States v. SlobodkinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
  4. United States v. HarkDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
  5. United States v. C. Thomas Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bowles v. National Erie Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. United States v. DelfrateDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. United States v. TantleffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API