Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1992No. E008813PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TIMLIN, J.

Pursuant to Penal Code section 1238, subdivision (a)(1), the People appeal from a ruling by the trial court under Penal Code section 995 setting aside the one-count information the People had filed against defendant. The gist of the People’s argument on appeal is that the trial court erroneously granted defendant’s motion to set aside the information as a consequence of its (the trial court’s) misinterpretation of the phrase “the disposal of any hazardous waste,” as that phrase is used in the California Hazardous Waste Control Law (Health & Saf. Code, div. 20, ch. 6.5,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. People v. LaiwaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. CraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. SobiekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. People v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. People v. Buena Vista Mines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. NOORICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Opinion No. (1998), California Attorney General Reports1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API