Legal Opinion

People v. Craft

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1986No. Crim. 23800PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

When a perpetrator commits sex offenses against the same victim on “separate occasions,” Penal Code section 667.6, subdivision (d) (hereafter subdivision (d)), 1 requires the imposition of full, separate, and consecutive terms of imprisonment. We granted a hearing in this case to construe the foregoing crucial phrase.

Karen S. was driving alone one morning and stopped at a drive-in restaurant to use the restroom. As she returned to her car, defendant seized her from behind, threw her to the ground, and raped her. He then ordered her into the back seat of her car and drove away.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. BelmontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. DelozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. California School Employees Ass'n. v. Governing Board of the Marine Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API