Legal Opinion
People v. NOORI
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 2006No. B181950, B183383PublishedCited by 2 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KRIEGLER, J.
Since 1951, our Legislature has proscribed any person— other than specifically exempted financial institutions—from engaging “in the business of receiving money for the purpose of transmitting the same or its equivalent to foreign countries without first obtaining a license” from the Commissioner of the Department of Financial Institutions. (Fin. Code, § 1800.3, subd. (a).) Section 1823 makes it a felony for any person who has not complied with the department’s licensing requirements to represent that he or she is authorized to receive, or to solicit or receive, money for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. FudgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dept. of Alcoholic Bev. Control v. Alcoholic Bev. Control App. Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Portilla CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2021