Legal Opinion

People v. Bell

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1996No. D019480PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, J.

Appellant Robert Bell (Robert) was convicted of 10 counts of rent skimming, 1 count of attempted rent skimming, 13 counts of forgery, 14 counts of filing a false instrument and sentenced to a term of 4 years. Appellant Cathleen Bell (Cathleen) was found guilty of eight counts of rent skimming, one count of filing a false instrument, one count of forgery and was granted probation. They appeal, raising various claims concerning the statute of limitations, instructions to the jury, suppression motions, the constitutionality of criminal rent skimming statutes and sentencing.

In…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  5. People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. AtkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. GreenbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Moss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API