Legal Opinion

State v. Allison

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKonenkamp, Justice

[¶ 1.] Defendant failed to return government issued equipment at the end of his military service with the South Dakota Army National Guard. When he was charged with theft under a law making it a crime to retain military property, the circuit court dismissed the indictment, concluding that the statute violated our consti*2tutional prohibition on imprisonment for debt. We reverse. Service in the armed forces is not a debtor-creditor relationship, and issuance of military equipment is not a loan or an extension of credit, but a temporary entrustment of public property, which must be restored to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Speidel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Strattman v. StudtOhio Supreme Court · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. PiperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. AsmussenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. PageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. StarkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API