Legal Opinion
State v. Asmussen
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 20, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] The State filed a complaint against David J. Asmussen (Asmussen) for three counts of stalking. The second count of the complaint charged that As-mussen committed the public offense of stalking (SDCL 22-19A-l(3) and 22-6-2(1)) by willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly harassing Pamela Dunn by means of verbal, electronic, mechanical, telegraphic, or written communications. As-mussen filed a motion to dismiss count II of the complaint asserting that SDCL 22-19A-1(3) is facially unconstitutional. The trial court granted Asmussen’s motion and dismissed count II of the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WelchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- State v. AsmussenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. PageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.