Poppen v. Walker
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*240STEELE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal from a grant of summary judgment for the defendants. We reverse and remand.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On November 30, 1992, the Plaintiffs filed this action seeking an alternative writ of prohibition restraining the defendants (State) from operating video lottery and a "writ of mandamus requiring the immediate revocation of video lottery licenses. Both parties filed cross motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted the State’s motion, ruling that video lottery is a “lottery” within the meaning of Article III, § 25 of the South Dakota Constitution, that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Fairbank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. SaxlSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Kyllo v. PanzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. FierroSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. KarlenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- South Dakota Education Association/ NEA Ex Rel. Roberts v. BarnettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Rupert v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.