Legal Opinion
Ray v. FEDIX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided November 5, 2009No. 07-2598 JPM-dkvPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JON PHIPPS McCALLA, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “FedEx Services”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 67), filed March 13, 2009. Joe M. Ray, Jr. (“Plaintiff’) responded in opposition on April 13, 2009 (Doc. 70). With leave of Court, Defendant filed a reply brief (Doc. 84) on May 4, 2009. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
I. RELEVANT FACTS
This cause of action arises out of Plaintiffs employment with Defendant. On August 2, 2002, Plaintiff…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dekarske v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- Pfeifer v. Federal Express Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Mazurkiewicz v. Clayton Homes, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Boaz v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Barfield v. Fed. Express Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.