Legal Opinion
Barfield v. Fed. Express Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 3, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-17-2403PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EWING WERLEIN, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pending are Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 19) and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike (Document No. 23). After carefully considering the motions, responses, reply, and the applicable law, and having conducted a hearing to receive oral arguments, the Court concludes as follows.
I. Background
In June 1996, Plaintiff DeWayne Barfield ("Plaintiff") applied for employment with Defendant Federal Express Corporation ("Defendant").1 As part of his application, Plaintiff executed an employment *1045agreement ("the Employment Agreement") that…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gaskin v. Phillips 66 CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
- Montague v. City of Moss Point, MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022