Legal Opinion
Dekarske v. Federal Express Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 9, 2013No. 11-12132PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 26)
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Federal Express Corporation’s (“FedEx”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 26.) Plaintiff filed a response (ECF No. 29) and FedEx filed a reply (ECF No. 30). The Court held a hearing on July 2, 2013. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS FedEx’s motion for summary judgment.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff James Dekarske was terminated by Defendant Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”) on July 23, 2009, for a failure to report an occurrence…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Stanley v. Expressjet Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Elizarov v. Equity Experts LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Barfield v. Fed. Express Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
- Al-Qari v. American Steamship CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Atanasovski v. Epic Equipment & Engineering, Inc. Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.