Legal Opinion
Kucza v. Stone
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 31, 1967PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
In this action, arising out of a 1959 rear-end collision, the plaintiff alleged that he was permanently injured by the negligent operation of an automobile by Robert E. Stone. There were no eyewitnesses except the parties. Included among several injuries claimed by the plaintiff was one to his lumbar spine, diagnosed as a herniated disc. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants. The court accepted the verdict and denied a motion by the plaintiff to set it aside. From the judgment rendered, the plaintiff has taken this appeal.
An evidential ruling, properly assigned as error, is decisive…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brockett v. JensenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- DeCarufel v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Grievance Committee v. DaceySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Thomas v. GanezerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Bartolotta v. CalvoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Dreier v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Tough v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Ferreira v. PringleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Schenck v. PelkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.