Legal Opinion
DeCarufel v. Colonial Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 29, 1955PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
The plaintiff brought suit to recover the reasonable value of services alleged to have been requested by and rendered to Eugenie C. Hablitzel during the latter’s lifetime. The case was tried to the jury, who returned a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed, assigning error in the court’s refusal to charge as requested and in two rulings on evidence, of which only one is pressed.
A detailed recital of the parties’ offers of proof is not necessary. It will be ample, under the circumstances, to say that the plaintiff offered evidence to prove the following: Eugenie C. Hablitzel…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Frechette v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Castaldo v. D'ERAMOSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Borsoi v. SparicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Sickmund v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Carney v. DeweesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Casalo v. ClaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.