Legal Opinion
Floyd v. Rubin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 1999No. Civil Action 98-670(SS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SPORKIN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs are approximately 550 criminal investigators of the U.S. Secret Service (“Secret Service”) who retired before October 80, 1994. Although plaintiffs were federal employees, their retirement benefits are governed by the District of Columbia Police and Firefighters Retirement and Disability Act (“DCRA”), D.C.Code §§ 4-601 through 4-634. Defendant District of Columbia administers plaintiffs’ retirement benefits, which are funded by the federal defendants. Amici represent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Floyd v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- N.W. Enterprises, Inc. v. City of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
- Lanier v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eisenbeiser v. ChertoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- City of Annapolis v. BowenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Floyd, J.B. v. Paulson, Henry M.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- (HC) Burgess v. The People of the State of CADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022