Legal Opinion

Eisenbeiser v. Chertoff

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 25, 2006No. Civil Action 04-0615 (EGS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SULLIVAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are United States Secret Service (“USSS”) employees 1 hired between 1984 and 1986. They allege they have been erroneously placed within the Federal Employees’ Retirement System (“FERS”) and that they are entitled to elect more favorable coverage under the District of Columbia Retirement Act (“DCRA”). They seek declaratory and in-junctive relief to obtain “statutory entitlements and benefits under the DCRA.” Compl. ¶ 1. Upon consideration of plaintiffs’ filings, the responses and replies thereto, supplemental pleadings, and the entire…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Yancey v. St. Elizabeths HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. (PS) Robbins v. Merit Systems Protection BoardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. (PS) Robbins v. Merit Systems Protection BoardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. (PS) Robbins v. Merit Systems Protection BoardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. In re Show Cause Order Dated November 17, 2022District Court, D. Maryland · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API