Legal Opinion

Lanier v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 14, 1994No. Civ. A. 94-0013PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SPORKIN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and Defendant United States’ cross-motion to dismiss. This case presents an issue of statutory construction. Plaintiffs are all retired members of the U.S. Secret Service Uniformed Division (“Secret Service”). Although they were federal employees, their retirement is governed by the District of Columbia Police and Firefighters Retirement and Disability Act (“District Retirement Act”), D.C.Code §§ 4-601 through 4-634. The issue presented to the Court is whether pursuant to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Mary Tataranowicz v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., in His Official Capacity as Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  3. In Re James E. Mitchell and Diane C. Mitchell, Debtors. James E. Mitchell Diane C. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Floyd v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  2. District of Columbia v. TarloskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. District of Columbia v. GouldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Gause v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Gause v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API