Legal Opinion

(HC) Burgess v. The People of the State of CA

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 14, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00573Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DWAYNE LAMONT BURGESS, No. 2:22-CV-0573-DAD-DMC-P 12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. 14 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil action, which has been 19 entered on the Court’s docket as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 20 Rule 4 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides for summary 21 dismissal of a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Buchanan v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  5. Fayerweather v. BellDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API