Legal Opinion

City of Annapolis v. Bowen

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 30, 2007No. 2462, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrauser, J.

Sixty-two retired firefighters and police officers claim that, when their former employer, the City of Annapolis (“City”), reclassified the positions of their active-duty counterparts so that they would ultimately receive more compensation for the positions they currently held, it was required, under Annapolis City Code § 3.36.150A1 (“ACC”), to increase their pension payments in tandem. Because it did not, they filed a com plaint, in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, for declaratory and injunctive relief. But that action was dismissed without prejudice by the circuit court for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Heaps v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Hecht v. CrookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  5. In Re Mark M.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bowen v. City of AnnapolisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Gray v. FentonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. (2007), Maryland Attorney General Reports2007
  4. Green Healthcare Sol'ns v. Med. Cannabis Comm'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API