Greer-Robbins Co. v. Pacific Surety Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
WORKS, J., pro tem.
This appeal comes to us under the alternative method. The constant lapses, on the part of the profession, from a proper observance of the rules of practice governing the prosecution of appeals under this method have made it, to us and to the other appellate courts of the state, a dreadful alternative indeed. Once again, at more than a risk of repetition, we call attention to the fact that, under the method, and according to the provisions of section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure, the parties must print in their briefs “such portions of the record as they desire to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Paine v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- South Knoxville Brick Co. v. Empire State Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Barker Brothers v. JoosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Danek v. HommerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Lamb v. Belt Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.