Legal Opinion
Danek v. Hommer
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 27, 1953PublishedCited by 145 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
28 N.J. Super. 68 (1953)
100 A.2d 198
JOHN DANEK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JULIUS J. HOMMER AND KATHERYN HOMMER, PARTNERS TRADING AS HOMMER TOOL MFG. CO., DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS AS APPELLANTS,
v.
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT AS RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 5, 1953.
Decided October 27, 1953.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. Joseph Weintraub argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. McGlynn, Weintraub & Stein, attorneys for third-party plaintiffs as…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Goldberg v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Texas Co. v. Central Fuel Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- McVey v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
- In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Holder v. Elms Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Longobardi v. Chubb Ins. Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Sparks v. St. Paul InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Flomerfelt v. CardielloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.