Sorenson v. Stowers
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.
The question presented is whether proper service has been made on defendant Emmert under sec. 85.05 (3), Stats. It is undisputed that defendant Emmert was a nonresident. The collision from which damages are claimed occurred in Wisconsin, and service was properly made upon the commissioner of the motor vehicle department of the state of Wisconsin by filing a copy of the summons and complaint in his office, together with a fee of $2.
Sec. 85.05 (3), Stats., after providing for service on the commissioner of the motor vehicle department, provides that notice of such service and a copy of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- State ex rel. Cronkhite v. BeldenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Matthiesen v. MatthiesenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- State ex el. Nelson v. GrimmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by22 opinions
- Halliman v. StilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Cheek v. NortonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Kraft v. BahrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Colley v. DyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Waddell v. MamatWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.