Legal Opinion

Halliman v. Stiles

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 22, 1971No. 5-5478PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

This is an action instituted by appellees for personal injuries allegedly received in an automobile accident. A default judgment was entered against appellant; and, from a denial of his motion to vacate that judgment, he brings this appeal.

Appellees stopped on an ice-covered bridge where an accident had previously occurred causing several other automobiles to block both lanes of passage. Appellant, driving behind, collided into the rear of appellees’ car. The police who investigated the accident filed a report indicating that appellant was the holder of a Tennessee…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Hartley v. VitielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  5. State ex rel. Cronkhite v. BeldenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tucker v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Wilburn v. Keenan Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Carruth v. Design Interiors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Edmonson v. FarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API