Waddell v. Mamat
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
Respondent raises the question whether this is an appealable order. The order denies to appellants a substantial right given them by sec. 85.05 (3), Stats. 1951. It is a right comparable to that granted under sec. 326.12 which has been held to be a provisional remedy. See 1 Callaghan’s Wis. Dig., Appeal and Error, p. 293, sec. 197. An order denying such a right is appealable under sec. 274.33.
Sec. 85.05 (3), Stats. 1951, so far as material, provided:
“The use and operation by a nonresident of a motor vehicle over the highways of Wisconsin shall be deemed an irrevocable appointment binding upon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sorenson v. StowersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Wisconsin Labor Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rosenberg v. SmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Steffen v. LittleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Lands' End, Inc. v. City of DodgevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Niesen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Department of Revenue v. DziubekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.