Legal Opinion

Waddell v. Mamat

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1955PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

Respondent raises the question whether this is an appealable order. The order denies to appellants a substantial right given them by sec. 85.05 (3), Stats. 1951. It is a right comparable to that granted under sec. 326.12 which has been held to be a provisional remedy. See 1 Callaghan’s Wis. Dig., Appeal and Error, p. 293, sec. 197. An order denying such a right is appealable under sec. 274.33.

Sec. 85.05 (3), Stats. 1951, so far as material, provided:

“The use and operation by a nonresident of a motor vehicle over the highways of Wisconsin shall be deemed an irrevocable appointment binding upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. StowersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Wisconsin Labor Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. SmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Steffen v. LittleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Lands' End, Inc. v. City of DodgevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Niesen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Department of Revenue v. DziubekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API