Legal Opinion

Butler-Veitch, Inc. v. Barnard

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1926No. Docket No. 3054PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PULLEN, J., pro tem.

This action was brought by the respondent, as plaintiff, against the defendant and appellant for a specified sum, being the installment payments due it at the date of the commencement of the action under an executory contract of sale, wherein plaintiff had agreed to sell and defendant had agreed to buy a motor truck, the total price payable in installments.

Defendant answered, admitting the execution of the contract, but alleged that at the same time and place and as a part of the same transaction and at the instance of plaintiff, and as an inducement to the defendant to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. J. B. Colt Co. v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Kearney v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Bechtold v. ConeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Paolini v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Parker v. James Granger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Dyke v. ZaiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Free v. FurrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Gish v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API