Bechtold v. Coney
California Court of Appeal
3. How and within what time right of rescission of contract must be exercised, note, 74 Am. Dec. 657. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This is an action for the cancellation of a certain contract for the sale and purchase by the plaintiffs of certain territorial rights in a United States patent covering a file-sharpening device, and the recovery of $250 paid by plaintiffs on account of the purchase price of such rights. Plaintiffs claim the right to rescind and cancel the contract because of certain alleged misrepresentations and fraud practiced upon them by the defendant, which induced them to enter into said contract. Judgment was for the plaintiffs and the defendant appeals.
The contract of sale was in writing and is in…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Reiniger v. HassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Wilson v. Rigali & VeselichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Pohl v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Benson v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Butler-Veitch, Inc. v. BarnardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.