Legal Opinion

Courter v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 7, 2017No. 130507693; A157740PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment in favor of defendant City of Portland (the city) dismissing plaintiffs’ inverse condemnation claim and their request for declaratory relief under the Declaratory Judgments Act, ORS 28.010 to 28.160. In 2003, the city condemned an easement for the “placement of utilities” beneath an access road on plaintiffs’ property, in order to bury pipes to connect a water tank to the city’s water system. According to plaintiffs, the city agreed during the 2003 condemnation trial to bury the pipes at a depth of at least 18 feet but later buried them as shallow as four feet.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Shattuck v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Perma Treat, Inc. v. Toma Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. Kessler v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. Walton v. Neskowin Regional Sanitary AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Kessler v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Reeves v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API