Legal Opinion
Ashley v. Metz
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided September 9, 1974No. 57621PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Commissioner.
Action by plaintiffs for declaration that certain tax bills of the City of Kansas City are invalid and void; counterclaim by de*309fendant Paul Metz, Treasurer of the City of Kansas City, for certain taxes and interest. Appeal by plaintiffs from judgment for defendant Metz in plaintiffs’ action and for defendant in sum $4,251.06 and interest on his counterclaim. Construction of revenue laws is involved.
Plaintiffs initiated this action by Petition for Injunction and for a Restraining Order, alleging that: Plaintiffs are partners in the Kansas City Public Service Freight…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- KANS. CITY SO. RY. v. Road Imp. Dist. No. 6Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Road Improvement District Number 6 of Little RiverSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Meier v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sears v. City of ColumbiaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983