Sears v. City of Columbia
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LOWENSTEIN, Judge.
This appeal follows a trial court memorandum decision and judgment finding un*240constitutional and invalid certain tax bills sought to be assessed against plaintiffs-respondents (comprising some 23 of 41) abutting landowners (Landowners), by the defendant-appellant City of Columbia (City) for widening, paving and other reconstruction made by the City on Oakland Gravel Road (Oakland Gravel). The trial court found the proposed tax bills invalid on the ground that the plaintiffs-Landowners’ properties had not been benefited, and that the actions of the City in assessing the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- City of St. Joseph v. HankinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Heidrich v. City of Lee's SummitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Bunker R-III School District v. HodgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Harry H. Houf & Sons, Contractors, Inc. v. City of WellsvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- City of Springfield v. BradleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Kline v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984