Legal Opinion
KANS. CITY SO. RY. v. Road Imp. Dist. No. 6
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 6, 1921No. 205PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
256 U.S. 658 (1921)
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.
v.
ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 6 OF LITTLE RIVER COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
No. 205.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 16, 17, 1921.
Decided June 6, 1921.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS.
Mr. Samuel W. Moore and Mr. James B. McDonough, with whom Mr. Frank H. Moore and Mr. A.F. Smith were on the briefs, for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. John P. DuLaney, with whom Mr. A.D. DuLaney was on the brief, for defendant in error.
2Opinion of the Court · McREYNOLDSJustice McREYNOLDS
Proceeding under Act No. 338, 1915 Session, Arkansas Legislature, the County Court created and fixed…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Gast Realty & Investment Co. v. Schneider Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by63 opinions
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Aetna Life Insurance v. DunkenSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Evans v. Beattie, Comptroller GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- State v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Morton Salt Co. v. City of South HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.