Legal Opinion

Meier v. City of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 9, 1904PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — How. Jesse A.-McDonald, Judge. (1) Special assessments for local improvements are made under the taxing power.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — How. Jesse A.-McDonald, Judge. (1) Special assessments for local improvements are made under the taxing power. Garrett v. St. Louis, 25 Mo. 508; Hernán v. Allen, 156 Mo. 513; s. c., 181 U. S. 102; Hernán v. Schulte, 166 Mo. 109, 189 U. S. 507; Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. French, 158 Mo. 515, (same case as French v. B. A. P. Co., 181 U. S. 321); Moberly v. Hogan, 131 Mo. 23; Wright v. Davidson, 181 U. S. 379; Fallbrook, etc., Co. v. Bradley, 161 H. S. 176; Pittsburg v. Sterrett Subdistrict School, 201 Penn. 636, 61 L. E. A. 183. Special assessment…

1Opinion of the Court

GANTT, J. — This

is a suit in equity to cancel two special taxbills made out, certified and registered by the president of the Board of Public Improvements and the Comptroller of the city St. Louis, and at the time of the bringing of this suit ready for delivery to the contractor in payment for tbe improvements of Texas avenue in the city of St. Louis between Miami and Potomac streets. Tbe plaintiff is the owner of the property against which an assessment was made for a proportionate part of the cost; tbe defendant Henry Ruck.ert is the contractor who did tbe work. The cause was heard upon an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Williams v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Kansas City v. Marsh Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. Webster v. FargoSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Rombauer v. Compton Heights Christian ChurchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  3. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. Morey Engineering & Construction Co. v. St. Louis Artificial Ice Rink Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  5. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API