Legal Opinion

State v. Gonzalez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 12, 2012No. 1 CA-CR 11-0494PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Judge.

¶ 1 Alfredo Gonzalez appeals his conviction for transportation of dangerous drugs for sale. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. In reaching our decision, we hold that expert testimony as to the modus operandi of a drag trafficking organization may, depending upon the facts and circumstances of a case, be admitted as evidence. 1 There is no per se rule of inadmissibility for such testimony, and trial courts have the discretion to consider the relevancy and danger for unfair prejudice of such evidence on a case-by-ease basis.

Factual Background

¶ 2 On July 27, 2010,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reid v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  4. United States v. Mariano MurilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of Washington v. Bryan Jack Ross CrowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. State v. Garcia-QuintanaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. State of Arizona v. CoopermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. State v. EscalanteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API