Legal Opinion
State v. Heath
Montana Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 2004No. 02-403 & 02-405PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray
¶1 Barry Alonzo Heath appeals from the judgment and sentence entered by the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, on a *214jury verdict convicting him of the felony offenses of sexual intercourse without consent and witness tampering. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for resentencing.
¶2 Heath raises the following issues on appeal:
¶3 1. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in denying Heath’s challenges to two prospective jurors for cause?
¶4 2. Did the District Court err in sentencing Heath on the conviction for sexual intercourse without consent?
BACKGROUND
¶5 The State…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Richard Clinton AllsupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- State v. MartinezMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- James Kiernan and Mary Kiernan v. Gerald Van Schaik, T/a Van's Atlantic StationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- State v. GoodMontana Supreme Court · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Whitlow v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. HicksMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CarterMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WebbMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HEAFNERMontana Supreme Court · 2010
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.