Legal Opinion

State v. Muhammad

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2002No. 00-663PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Carlos A-Lail Muhammad (“Muhammad”) appeals from the June 7,2000, Order entered by the Montana Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, revoking his deferred sentence for violating its sentencing condition requiring that he not reside or work within Cascade County. Additionally, Muhammad appeals from the District Court’s imposition of the following conditions in its June 7,2000, Order requiring that: he post a prominent sign at every entrance of his residence stating, “CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF 18 ARE NOT ALLOWED BY COURT ORDER”, he pay $5,000.00 in restitution, and he obtain the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. LenihanMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. MontoyaMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. BurdinTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. BristerMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. PritchettMontana Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. State v. AriegweMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. EatonMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. TracyMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. DunfeeMontana Supreme Court · 2005

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API