Legal Opinion
New World Pasta Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 1, 2004No. SLIP OP. 04-18; Court 03-00105PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
In an administrative appeal, Plaintiff challenges aspects of decisions made by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) concerning two of the investigated companies in Certain Pasta From Italy, 68 Fed.Reg. 6,882, 6,882-84 (Dep’t Commerce Feb. 11, 2003) (notice of final results of antidumping duty administrative review and determination not to revoke in part) (“Final Determination”). 1 With regards to the first company, Pastificio Garofalo S.p.A. (“Garofalo”), Plaintiff challenges Commerce’s decision not to “collapse” Ga-rofalo with an affiliate, 2 and its decision not to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pesquera Mares Australes Ltda. v. United States v. Coalition for Fair Atlantic Salmon TradeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- SKF USA Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. And Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. v. The United States, and the Timken CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Rhp Bearings Ltd., Nsk Bearings Europe Ltd., and Nsk Corporation v. United States, and the Torrington CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Fagersta Stainless AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Hontex Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Pastificio Lucio Garofalo, S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Manchester Tank & Equip. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.