Legal Opinion
Fagersta Stainless AB v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 28, 2008No. Slip Op. 08-87; Court 07-00153PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
This action arises out of the administrative review of an antidumping duty order conducted by the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). During the course of the review, Plaintiff Fag-ersta Stainless AB (“Fagersta”) requested that Commerce modify its existing model-match methodology by adding an additional product criterion. Commerce rejected this request on the basis that Fagersta had not demonstrated that there were “compelling reasons” to do so. Plaintiff challenges this determination.
This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Corus Staal BV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Pesquera Mares Australes Ltda. v. United States v. Coalition for Fair Atlantic Salmon TradeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Maverick Tube Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Stupp Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Union Steel v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Sidenor Industrial SL v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.