Legal Opinion

State v. Diggs

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1969No. 697SC509PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court to grant his motion of nonsuit made at the conclusion of the State’s evidence and renewed at the conclusion of all of the evidence. There is no merit in this assignment of error. It is elementary that upon a motion for nonsuit in a criminal case, all the evidence upon the whole record tending to sustain a conviction is to be considered in the light most favorable to the State and the State is entitled to every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. State v. Bruton, 264 N.C. 488, 142 S.E. 2d 169. When the evidence in the present case is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. VickersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API