Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 21, 1970No. 7010SC577PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

Defendant’s sole assignment of error is to the court’s denial of his motion for nonsuit as to the forgery count.

The common law definition of forgery obtains in this State since the statutes relating to forgery do not define it. Trust Co. v. Casualty Co., 231 N.C. 510, 57 S.E. 2d 809. Three elements are necessary to constitute the offense: (1) There must be a false making or other alteration of some instrument in writing; (2) there must be a fraudulent intent; and (3) the instrument must be apparently capable of effecting a fraud. State v. Greenlee, 272 N.C. 651, 159 S.E. 2d 22;…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Cross v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. People v. MunroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. People v. GayleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. People v. MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BauguessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Friscia v. Bank of Am., N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API