Legal Opinion

Connor v. Williams

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 24, 1972No. 71-221PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Per curiam

After determining that the reapportionment plan for the State Senate and House of Representatives, passed by the Mississippi Legislature in January 1971, failed to comply with the Equal Protection Clause because of a total variance of 26% between the largest and the smallest senatorial district (a determination that was not appealed), 1 the District Court fashioned its own plan for the quadrennial elections for both Houses scheduled for 1971, and these elections were held under the court’s plan. Connor v. Johnson, 330 F. Supp. 506 (SD Miss. 1971). Appellants now challenge the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Connor v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Wells v. RockefellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mahan v. HowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Chapman v. MeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Ryder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Connor v. FinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API