Legal Opinion

Mahan v. Howell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 2, 1973No. 71-364PublishedCited by 438 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist

Acting pursuant to the mandate of its newly revised state constitution,1 the Virginia General Assembly enacted statutes apportioning the State for the election of members of its House of Delegates2 and Senate.3 Two suits were brought challenging the constitutionality of the House redistricting statute on the grounds that there were impermissible population variances in the districts, that the multimember districts diluted representation,4 and that the use of multimember districts *318constituted racial gerrymandering.5 The Senate redistricting statute was attacked in a separate suit, which…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Whitcomb v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Roman v. SincockSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by438 opinions

  1. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Charles F. Zimmer, Stewart Marshall, Intervenor-Appellant v. John J. McKeithenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. Voinovich v. QuilterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

433 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API