Legal Opinion

Connor v. Finch

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 31, 1977No. 76-777PublishedCited by 355 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

The question in this litigation concerns the constitutional validity of a legislative reapportionment plan devised by a three-judge Federal District Court for Mississippi’s Senate and House of Representatives. In Nos. 76-777 and 76-935, the *409appellants are the Mississippi voters who originally brought this class action in the District Court. They challenge the court’s entire Senate plan, and aspects of the House plan, as failing to meet the basic one-person, one-vote requirements of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and particularly the constitutional and equitable…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by355 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Growe v. EmisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Voinovich v. QuilterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

350 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API