Legal Opinion
Burako v. Munro
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 22, 1959No. Civ. 18442PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
Petitioners’ on-sale liquor license was ordered suspended for 45 days. The Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board affirmed. The superior court issued alternative writ of mandate and, after hearing, denied peremptory writ. Petitioners appeal.
The accusation against petitioners was in four counts. Count 1 charged that on November 7, 1956, Brdar, one of the licensees, sold vodka “to an obviously intoxicated female person whose first name is Fay, and whose last name is not known to the complainant.” Count 2 charged sale on the next day “to an obviously intoxicated person whose name is not known…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marcucci v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Brice v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Wright v. MunroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Bazaure v. RichmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Farah v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stearns v. Fair Employment Practice CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Stoumen v. MunroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Lacabanne Properties, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Epstein v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Mundell v. Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.