Legal Opinion

Epstein v. California Horse Racing Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1963No. Civ. 26988PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court granting respondent a peremptory writ of mandate commanding appellant California Horse Racing Board to set aside its decision and order of March 19, 1962, by which it determined that respondent should not be granted permission to engage in parimutuel wagering and should not be permitted access to racing enclosures within its jurisdiction.

Initially, it should be noted that, contrary to respondent’s contentions, the proceeding before the court below did not constitute a trial de novo. Its findings, therefore, are not binding upon this…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Covert v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. In Re PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Thompson v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Opdyk v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. United States v. Charles Michael PottsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. People v. VasquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Copeland v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API