Legal Opinion
Stoumen v. Munro
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 14, 1963No. Civ. 20310PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.
Appellant holds a general on-sale liquor license for premises known as the Black Cat, located on Montgomery Street in San Francisco. An amended accusation filed before the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control charged him, in Count I thereof, with violating section 25601 of the Business and Professions Code (keeping a disorderly house) 1 and, in Count II thereof, with violating section 24200 subdivision (e) of said code (resort for sexual perverts). 2
A hearing officer took evidence and found that the allegations in both counts were true with the exception of three of the nine…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Hohreiter v. GarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Swars v. Council of City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Boreta Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Schenley Affiliated Brands Corp. v. KirbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Porter v. Sandra R.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.