Legal Opinion
Wright v. Munro
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 8, 1956No. Civ. 16968PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
The Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control revoked the general on-sale liquor license of petitioner. The appeal hoard affirmed. Thereupon, the petitioner sought a writ of mandate to review the propriety of the ruling. From a judgment denying the petition for a writ of mandate petitioner appeals.
On March 4, 1954, the State Board of Equalization, the predecessor of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, charged the appellants with having violated section 25657, subdivision (b) of the Business and Professions Code, 1 and thus created a cause for suspension or revocation of their liquor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cornell v. ReillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Phillips v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Mast v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Taylor v. Bureau of Private Investigators & AdjustersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Glenn v. Board of County Commissioners, Sheridan CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
- Mandel v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. WegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.