DeSantis v. Miller Petroleum Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of defendant Caminol Company, Ltd., after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover a sum of money alleged to be due as the purchase price for certain merchandise plaintiffs appeal.
These are the essential facts:
Ducommun Metals & Supply Company sold to defendant Miller Petroleum Company oil well tubing and casing, upon the purchase price of which there remained unpaid $12,166.93. Plaintiffs guaranteed that the Miller Petroleum Company would pay for the merchandise, and, upon its failure to do so, paid the amount of the indebtedness to the Ducommun…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cowan v. TrembleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Heaton-Hobson Associated Law Offices v. ArperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Wallace v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- California Canning Peach Growers v. Bardell & OregoniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by8 opinions
- Boise City v. Better Homes, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Interstate Group Administrators, Inc. v. Cravens, Dargan & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Evans v. ZeiglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Carranza v. NoroianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Aetna Carpet Co. v. PenznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.