Legal Opinion
Cowan v. Tremble
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1931No. Docket No. 7659PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This action was brought to recover damages for the alleged breach of a contract. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $3,000. Defendants’ motion for a new trial was denied, and they have appealed from the judgment entered on the verdict.
The defendants, who are copartners, were conducting a transfer business between Los Angeles and neighboring cities under the name of Service Motor Express Company. In January, 1923, Carl I. Jacobson—who, as the evidence shows, was the agent of plaintiff—commenced negotiations with defendant Tremble, who was in charge of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hoppin v. MunseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Cederberg v. RobisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Cavanaugh v. CasselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Thompson v. SprayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Harper v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Simpson v. BergmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Buckley v. Shell Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- American Builder's Assn. v. Au-YangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- MARVIN LIEBLEIN, INC. v. ShewryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- DeSantis v. Miller Petroleum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.