Legal Opinion

People v. Zimmerman

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1906No. Crim. No. 37PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County and from an order refusing a new trial. W. S. Wells, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of robbery. He made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal is from the judgment and the order denying the motion.

There is no question as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. It shows that on the 20th of March, 1905, one Daly, as a messenger of the Central Bank of Oakland, in company with one Roche, was carrying $10,000 in gold and silver coin, the property of said bank, from its place of business in Oakland, to the Bank of Point Richmond in Contra Costa county. On the trip, which was made in a buggy in open…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. People v. TesharaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. WinthropCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  5. People v. SampsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API