Legal Opinion

People v. Winthrop

California Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1897No. Crim. No. 290PublishedCited by 40 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of tbe Superior Court of tbe City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. "William T. Wallace, Judge. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion of tbe court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.

Defendant was convicted of robbery and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying bis application for a new trial, urging numerous errors in tbe rulings of tbe trial court.

1. It is first strongly contended that tbe court violated defendant’s rights in compelling him to go to trial with unseemly baste, and without sufficient time to adequately prepare for bis defense.

Tbe bill of exceptions shows that the indictment was filed August 7, 1896, and defendant arraigned thereunder on August 14th; that after certain proceedings of a more or less dilatory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. FredericksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. People v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. CaroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. FouquetteNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  5. People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API